Wednesday Quote: Neighbors

Kierkegaard 20090502-DSCF1495
Statue of Kierkegaard, photo by Arne List
[GFDL or CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons

". . . love your neighbour!  As already shown, you can easily find him; him you can never lose.  The beloved can treat you in such a way that he is lost to you, and you can lose a friend, but whatever a neighbour does to you, you can never lose him . . . it is not your neighbour who holds you fast—it is your love which holds your neighbour fast."
This is from Soren Kierkegaard's analysis of "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself," in his Works of Love (transl. Howard and Edna Hong).  I'd not fully realized the simple profoundness of this commandment before reading this book a couple of years ago.  Though it's a tough one to peruse, there's many such great quotes in Works of Love.

Comments

cleopatra said…
I don't really understand what Kierkegaard means by this quote. Why are neighbours accepted over friends and family? Why can we lose a loved one and friend but not a neighbour? Because we love the neighbour? But then why can't we love a friend or loved in the same way? Especially if your love "holds" the neighbour, it would hold the friend and loved one as well. Is it because you aren't as close to a neighbour that you can love him in this way? That would be rather depressing. Wow, with all my questions, it's apparent that I desperately need to read Kierkegaard. Don't worry, Marian, I don't expect you to answer any of them, I'm just talking out loud! ;-)
January 10, 2018 at 4:40 PM
Marian H said…
All great questions, Cleo, and I love that you're making me look at it in a different way. :) The way I have read this before - and this could be wrong, but - it seems like he's talking about 'neighbor' in a conceptual way, and as all-encompassing... If you lose a friend, you lose a special emotional connection, so yes, you have lost a 'friend.' But that person is still a neighbor in a broad sense, and your connection to them is defined by the fact that you love them. So there will always be someone to care about, even if one loses all friends and family...'neighbors' will still be left.
January 11, 2018 at 5:19 PM
Cleo Ross said…
Thanks for the explanation. I think what is getting in my way of understanding is what I read about love in The Art of Loving book that I was talking about in one of the posts on my blog. He redefines love as a faculty instead of making it about a "person". So then, when Kierkegaard is sounding like he's making it like a person, I resist that philosophy. However, you could look at it that by using the word "neighbour" he is discussing love in a more global sense, which I can appreciate. What bothers me is his reference to losing a friend or loved one because of they way he treats you. I can understand losing them but I don't think we should stop loving them. Does God no longer love us when we treat Him badly? And I'm still not clear how we are unable to lose a neighbour and therefore we can always love him. But I should just read Kierkegaard's work instead of throwing random thoughts your way, lol! Thanks for listening ..... :-)
January 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM
Ruth said…
That last part sounds too much like Bonhoeffer's quote on marriage: “It is not your love that sustains the marriage, but from now on, the marriage that sustains your love.” He wrote that in May 1943; I wonder if Bonhoeffer read Kierkegaard? Bonhoeffer was German, Kierkegaard Danish...??? Hmm...
January 17, 2018 at 2:31 PM
Marian H said…
Ohhh, interesting...it's certainly possible! If so, it sounds like a response, almost as if to argue it's our ties that fuel our love and not vice-versa. I wonder if Bonhoeffer would apply that to all kinds of relationships or just to marriage?
January 18, 2018 at 9:40 PM
Marian H said…
He does say elsewhere in the book not to "give up hope" on anyone, so the way I would interpret "loss" here is a loss of closeness, not loss of love. :) I think he was basing it on his personal experience of a breakup with his fiancee...he never stopped loving her, but there was a loss just the same.


January 18, 2018 at 9:44 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Septober, Octember, Nowonder...

Image
WHERE did October go??  Two weeks since my last post, can't believe it. Book-wise... I did finish The Art of Loving and need to write up my final post this weekend.  For a short book it was quite a journey, and thought-provoking - I'm grateful Cleo hosted it as a readalong! Also in non-fiction land, I read Permanent Record , Edward Snowden's new autobiographical memoir.  I knew very little about him previously, and it actually blew me away.  It might be because I'm a millennial: I saw bits and pieces of my own life experience in his, and it was kind of surreal reading it in book form.  Of course it focuses on his path from dutiful employee to whistleblower, which was fascinating from a psychological and technological perspective.  Definitely recommended. The one classic I read was Macbeth .  To be honest, I found it massively underwhelming, which is probably just me.  I may try to share some thoughts about it. I am still reading Moby-Dick for Brona '
Read more

The Art of Loving - A Ramble on Chapters 1–2.1

Image
This month, Cleo is hosting a readalong of The Art of Loving (1956) by Erich Fromm and On Friendship by Cicero. It's a sequel to the Four Loves Readalong - which feels recent but was actually back in June(!!).  Fromm and C. S. Lewis were contemporaries (and Lewis's book was published just four years later), so it adds interest to see how their perspectives correspond or differ.  I'm also looking forward to Cicero, as I haven't read many ancient classics. You can find the full schedule on Cleo's post.  I felt the need to break down my check-ins a little more, so this one will cover the first 1 1/3 chapters. Chapter 1, "Is Love an Art?" Fromm opens with his short but pithy thesis - that love is not just a flurry of feelings, but an actual scientific art, like music or medicine, which must be learned and practiced. He posits three interrelated societal problems.  First, culture is overly focused on the state of "being loved," particul
Read more

Autumn Plans

Image
It feels as if my reading has been slipping by the wayside, but that's not really been the case.  Most of the books I've read this summer just haven't blown me away, so it's been a bit of a disappointment. Reading status update on a few of the better ones: Tesla biography - I do like this book, a beautiful balance of academic and popular science.  It's very Educational, so it's taking me a while to get through it. 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea - Reading this for the 3rd or 4th time.  It is my favorite thing to read when I really want an escape.   Nostromo - Still chugging along, now in part 2.  New characters, new goings on.  I'm surprised actually at there being new characters; not sure where Conrad is taking it. Moby-Dick - Still participating in the read-along, but very much behind schedule. Brave New World - Started strong, then realized I needed a break from dystopian.  Will continue shortly. Psalms - Finished them!  Now re-reading Prov
Read more